The England head coach despised the term Bazball from its inception, deeming it overly simplistic and perhaps anticipating how it might be weaponised down the line. Currently, trailing 2-0 in an away Ashes series that started with great expectations, it has turned into the subject of Australian jokes.
However the coach has contributed to the problem either. Following the gut-wrenching loss at the Gabba, his insistence that, if there was an issue, England were 'too prepared' before the pink-ball match was akin to trying to put out a bin fire with petrol. It risks becoming his epitaph as national coach if performances do not improve.
In a way, one must admire his commitment to the bit. As much as McCullum claims to ignore outside criticism, he will have been all too aware of an England team increasingly characterised as freewheeling and lacking preparation.
The reality, as ever, is more nuanced. England play as much golf during their scheduled breaks as their opponents and they practice equally hard. Before the Gabba Test, they trained for longer, logging five days to Australia's three, given their lack of exposure to the pink ball and the changes in lighting conditions.
The coach's point about being "excessively ready" was that those additional training days were his decision – the instance he blinked in his belief that less is more. It meant a significant amount of mental energy was expended before they even stepped out in the cauldron of Australia's fortress. While net practice are a chance to refine technique, they can also become a safety blanket; zero consequence work that simply keeps the reactions quick.
Fixtures are congested such that warm-up matches against state sides were not possible (and uncertain value, when you consider England playing three before the 5-0 series loss in 2013-14). What is harder to square is the dismissal of domestic red-ball cricket as a valuable experience more broadly, evidenced by a young player's unproductive season.
Match practice alone prepares cricketers for the various scenarios they walk out to face, and it is in this area where England have thus far fallen well short. It is not only with the bat – as poor as some of the shot selection has been – but an bowling attack that seems without a spearhead. None has shown the persistence or discipline that the exceptional Australian paceman and his support cast have displayed.
McCullum's free-spirit approach was freeing during its initial year, an effective, apt solution to eradicate the torpor that came before. The disappointment now stems from how it has seemingly failed to move beyond that point – an absence of an upgrade to the initial philosophy that has seen results decline to 14 wins and 14 losses from their most recent matches.
Among them is the wicketkeeper-batter, a gifted player, no question, but one who is being mercilessly targeted on each side of the bat and missed two crucial opportunities with the gloves. It probably does not help when your opposite number, Alex Carey, has just delivered a masterful performance.
Based on McCullum's words in the aftermath, England appear set to keep the faith with Smith in Adelaide. The expectation – as is the case – is that a return to a more familiar match environment unleashes his best, with Perth's trampoline surface and the unusual day-night format now out of the way.
The alternative is to enact the plan stumbled across during the series win in New Zealand 12 months ago by moving the batsman down to his more natural home as a active middle order player, giving him the wicketkeeping duties, and picking a fresh face at first drop. Bethell made some runs for the Lions recently, or maybe Will Jacks could perform a similar role to the former spinner in 2023.
Ultimately, these changes is perfect, with Australia's better fundamentals having destroyed pre-series optimism and pushed the broader philosophy into the harsh glare of scrutiny.